Side-by-side mattress testing · 144+ comparisons published
Quick Specs Comparison
Key Advantages
Why Choose Lull Original
- Simple, effective design
- Affordable price point
- Good motion isolation
Why Choose Nectar Memory Foam
- Exceptional value - premium feel at budget price
- Forever warranty - unprecedented coverage
- Outstanding motion isolation for couples
Lab Verdict
Cooling was a wash — both mattresses landed within half a degree of each other after 60 minutes of body heat. Nectar Memory Foam isolated motion better for couples (0.06g vs. 0.11g on the Lull Original). The Nectar Memory Foam relieved more shoulder pressure for side sleepers (29 mmHg vs. 33 mmHg). Perimeter compression was nearly identical — neither bed is the obvious pick on edge support alone. Responsiveness was comparable; repositioning effort should feel similar on either.
| Metric | Lull Original | Nectar Memory Foam | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooling (60-min Δ°F) | 3.6°F | 3.3°F | Nectar Memory Foam |
| Motion isolation (g) | 0.11g | 0.06g | Nectar Memory Foam |
| Edge sinkage | 2.3" | 2.1" | Nectar Memory Foam |
| Shoulder pressure (mmHg) | 33 mmHg | 29 mmHg | Nectar Memory Foam |
| Response time (s) | 1.3s | 1.2s | Nectar Memory Foam |
| Off-gassing | 2 days | 1 days | Nectar Memory Foam |
Median of 3 trials, 68°F climate-controlled lab. NL/KW / DH/KW · scoring vv2.1.

